Skip to main content

leaderboard.cn

Explore

Frontier Models
Historical Trends
Local Models
Compare Models
Ranking Studio

Library

Models
Pricing
Organizations
Benchmarks
Data sources

leaderboard.cn

Benchmark details loading

Loading page content

About Ranking methodology Changelog

v0.1.53.364ac010a008浙ICP备09076226号-7

Back to benchmarks

Workspace BenchAgents

Results for 11 models collected from 3 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

68.7%

2

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba

67.7%

3

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba

67.7%

4

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic

66.8%

5

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

65.6%

6

Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba

61.4%

7

GPT-5.5OpenAI

58.7%

8

Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

55.1%

9

Seed2.1 TurboByteDance

54.7%

10

Seed2.1 ProByteDance

53.0%

11 models total

Benchmark details loading

Back to benchmarks

Workspace BenchAgents

Results for 11 models collected from 3 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

68.7%

2

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95BAlibaba

67.7%

3

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba

67.7%

4

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic

66.8%

5

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

65.6%

6

Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba

61.4%

7

GPT-5.5OpenAI

58.7%

8

Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

55.1%

9

Seed2.1 TurboByteDance

54.7%

10

Seed2.1 ProByteDance

53.0%

11 models total