Skip to main content

leaderboard.cn

Explore

Frontier Models
Historical Trends
Local Models
Compare Models
Ranking Studio

Library

Models
Pricing
Organizations
Benchmarks
Data sources

leaderboard.cn

Benchmark details loading

Loading page content

About Ranking methodology Changelog

v0.1.53.364ac010a008浙ICP备09076226号-7

Back to benchmarks

ClawEval-MM (Pass@3)MultimodalAgents

Results for 10 models collected from 4 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

81.2%

2

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

81.2%

3

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba · 0902

80.2%

4

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic

73.3%

5

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba

64.4%

6

Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba

57.4%

7

Qwen3.8-27BAlibaba

57.4%

8

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic

52.5%

9

Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle

50.5%

10

Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba

42.6%

10 models total

Benchmark details loading

Back to benchmarks

ClawEval-MM (Pass@3)MultimodalAgents

Results for 10 models collected from 4 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

81.2%

2

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

81.2%

3

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba · 0902

80.2%

4

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic

73.3%

5

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba

64.4%

6

Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba

57.4%

7

Qwen3.8-27BAlibaba

57.4%

8

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic

52.5%

9

Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle

50.5%

10

Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba

42.6%

10 models total