Skip to main content

leaderboard.cn

Explore

Frontier Models
Historical Trends
Local Models
Compare Models
Ranking Studio

Library

Models
Pricing
Organizations
Benchmarks
Data sources

leaderboard.cn

Benchmark details loading

Loading page content

About Ranking methodology Changelog

v0.1.53.364ac010a008浙ICP备09076226号-7

Back to benchmarks

CharXiv(RQ)Multimodal

Official website

Results for 44 models collected from 17 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

88.9%

2

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba

88.4%

3

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle

86.2%

4

GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI

85.9%

5

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

85.8%

6

Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba

85.8%

7

Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle

85.2%

8

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

84.8%

9

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba

84.6%

10

Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle

84.5%

44 models total

Benchmark details loading

Back to benchmarks

CharXiv(RQ)Multimodal

Official website

Results for 44 models collected from 17 public sources.

Ranking Sources

#ModelScore

1

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

88.9%

2

Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba

88.4%

3

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle

86.2%

4

GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI

85.9%

5

GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI

85.8%

6

Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba

85.8%

7

Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle

85.2%

8

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

84.8%

9

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba

84.6%

10

Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle

84.5%

44 models total